Image default

The History and Evolution of Online Reviews

While traditional review methods are texts and star ranks, more consumers are turning to images and short videos. Instead of relying solely on text, review services should focus on providing helpful information through pictures and videos. Ideas are harder to fake and can quickly give consumers valuable information, which is why online review websites like have become prominent over the years. Videos can also be informative, and consumers increasingly use social media to share their opinions. In this way, review services can better serve their users.


Review aggregation

Review aggregation has been around for several years. It started in 1999, but for a long time, the only sources of these reviews were specific seller websites. Now, review aggregation is available on many platforms, from the most well-known search engines to the smallest social networks. While the emergence of review aggregation has been disruptive, the future looks bright. Here is a quick history of review aggregation.

Reviews have always been trusted, but there are a lot of factors that have changed recently. One of the most significant factors in consumer trust has been the lack of credibility. In 2016, more than half of consumers researched online before buying a product or service. Google alone is responsible for 89 percent of all internet searches. It will soon be able to aggregate user reviews and display them within search results.

The majority rule is the most common form of review aggregation. It has many benefits. First, it satisfies the universal domain, while secondly, it is neutral and unbiased. Finally, it is based on the majority rule. Therefore, it is a fair but unjustified way to evaluate products. It is also the most empowering form of aggregation. Most consumers will benefit from this system because it satisfies all three deciders – impartiality, neutrality, and positive responsiveness.


User-generated rating systems

Online review systems often suffer from selection bias, meaning only delighted customers will leave a review. In addition, these systems can backfire by encouraging people to submit sloppy or fast reviews. However, businesses can use these reviews as a goldmine of information to create a better customer experience. The following are some critical considerations when developing a user-generated rating system. Let’s start with an overview.

A user-generated rating system enables registered users to share their experiences with a product. Famous examples of such systems include TripAdvisor, which collects reviews for different locations, and IMDb, which gathers evaluations for audiovisual productions. These systems are particularly relevant to platforms where consumers cannot purchase goods or services directly. Therefore, it’s essential to understand how users rate the products and services they encounter online.

Fake reviews are another big concern when it comes to user-generated review systems. Although these reviews are primarily untrue, they have the potential to harm the reputation of legitimate businesses. A few platforms are regulated to prevent this from happening. Moreover, there are various ways to reduce the number of fraudulent or strategic reviews. However, these measures do not eliminate the need for users to leave untrue reviews.

A user-generated review system may also help prevent bias. In addition to letting users provide unbiased opinions, rating platforms can also allow users to leave comments. Traders can respond to these reviews or report comments that may be untrue. Users can also mark evaluations as applicable based on their own preferences. These approaches may be helpful in the long run for online reviews, but they must be tested and improved before they become widely adopted.



A new study suggests that incentives for writing online reviews have proven to increase reviewer contributions. The incentives influence reviewer behaviors, including frequency, length, and opinion expression. They will also influence the average rating, variance, and extreme rating. The research will help companies decide whether to continue implementing incentives to increase reviewer contributions. The study was published in the Journal of Marketing Research. To learn more about the research, please see the following summary.

While incentivization is an effective way to encourage positive reviews, it can create business problems. While incentivizing reviewers can increase the number of reviews, incentives may dilute the quality of the reviews. Additionally, it creates unrealistic expectations for customers. It is, therefore, crucial to carefully consider any incentive programs. Listed below are some best practices for companies wishing to promote positive reviews. They should provide clear incentives.

Incentivization for online reviews is a proven way to boost review quality. It can increase reviewer contributions, decrease extreme ratings, and increase frequency. It is also controversial, as some experts warn against offering incentives to influence online reviews. However, companies can still offer incentives irrespective of the reviews and should clearly mark reviews collected in exchange for incentives. In addition, it is essential to keep in mind the legal guidelines before implementing an incentive program.

Regarding incentives for online reviews, the academic community has studied various ways to incentivize reviewers. However, most research on this subject has focused on incentive schemes with no reevaluation. Another option is to offer badges or points, which content producers can keep once they have earned them. The best incentive program will reward the contributors for a higher number of reviews, which will eventually increase the reputation score of a business.


Influence on consumer behavior

In the present study, we investigate whether online product reviews influence consumers’ purchasing intention. We conducted an eye-tracking experiment to measure the amount of visual attention spent on positive and negative comments. We also investigated whether consumers pay more attention to negative comments than positive ones. Our results suggest that the presence of negative reviews affects purchase intention. This study also highlights the importance of identifying the authenticity of product reviews. Hence, this research will have practical implications for product and service marketers.

To study the influence of online reviews on consumer behavior, we collected reviews from four Taobao websites. We used the S-O-R model and the SPSS 19.0 software to analyze the data. We found that positive, moderate, and negative reviews significantly affected consumers’ purchasing behavior, but none of the four factors was statistically significant. However, we found that the quantity and quality of reviews affected consumers’ decision-making behavior. The quality of reviews determines whether consumers will purchase a product or service. If consumers can read positive and negative reviews, they are more likely to make a repeat purchase.

Consumer behavior is highly affected by the presence of online reviews. Eighty percent of consumers read online reviews before making a purchase. Reviews are powerful tools for engaging consumers; many customers rely on them to help them find the right product or service. One BrightLocal survey found that 85% of consumers read online reviews before purchasing. And a Harris Interactive study found that 42% of adults searched online for a business before doing business with them. In addition, 42% of those customers changed their minds about doing business with the company after reading reviews online.


Google’s search algorithm

The “Florida” update changed Google’s search algorithm despite what you might think. It was the first time the search giant penalized websites for keyword stuffing. It also signaled a shift toward quality content and solving user problems. However, it wasn’t easy to predict what the future holds for online reviews. You must understand how Google’s search algorithm works if you want your business to thrive.

Several years ago, it seemed that Google was a magical machine that would return relevant results. While this is true in some categories, the search algorithm has changed significantly. Google introduced its Multitask Unified Model in May 2021. It is 1,000 times more potent than its predecessor. But the problem remains. What’s changed now? Online reviews will still play a significant role in the future of search.

The changes made to Google’s search algorithm are not without consequences. It may lead to fewer direct keyword matches as it tries to understand searcher intent. It may also result in fewer direct keyword matches since Google’s AI scans your query and then surfaces pages that match your meaning. This change may be a good thing, but it also poses a big problem. Some argue that Google could use this technology to lead people away from their intended searches and towards paid advertisements. In that scenario, they may be gently algorithmically nudging you in an unexpected direction.